Use 304 for general corrosion-resistant parts, sheet metal, and anything welded or formed; it costs about half as much. Use 17-4 PH when a stainless part needs real strength: aged to H900 it reaches about 200 ksi (1,380 MPa) tensile and 44 HRC, nearly three times annealed 304, with comparable corrosion resistance. 17-4 PH is magnetic; annealed 304 is not.
Priced on the same representative part: plate, cnc machining, 50 pcs.
Tensile strengthMPa
Yield strengthMPa
Densityg/cm³
Max service temp°C
Elongation%
Raw material cost$/kg
| 17-4 PH | 304 SS | |
|---|---|---|
| How it gains strength | One aging treatment at 900–1,150 °F (482–621 °C) | Cold work only |
| Magnetism | Magnetic in all conditions | Non-magnetic when annealed |
| Machining | Condition A is about 35 HRC; slow and hard on tools | Soft but gummy; work-hardens |
| Heat treat distortion | Shrinks about 0.0004–0.0006 in/in when aged to H900 | Not heat treated |
| Condition choices | H900 for peak strength; H1025–H1150 for toughness and stress corrosion resistance | Annealed or cold-worked tempers |
| Product forms | Bar, plate, forgings, MIM feedstock and AM powder | Sheet, plate, bar, tube, wire and pipe |
Comparable in most atmospheres and fresh water. Neither is a chloride grade; for salt exposure, 316 is the better call. The H1025–H1150 conditions resist stress corrosion better than H900.
H900 gives peak strength, about 200 ksi (1,380 MPa) and 44 HRC, with low impact toughness. H1150 gives about 145 ksi (1,000 MPa) and 33 HRC with much better toughness. H1025 is a common middle ground for shafts and valve parts.
No. 304 cannot be hardened by heat treatment, only by cold work, as in quarter-hard to full-hard strip. For a hardenable stainless, use 17-4 PH or a martensitic grade such as 410 or 440C.
Try both on your part.
The builder prices the same geometry in every suitable process and material, with DFM for each.